Censorship - how Section 31 would be a joke in a digital age
Tuesday, July 31st, 2007 TweetJust reading a certain Sunday columnist’s rant about Section 31 and it all seems so out of time. The idea of a legal ban on hearing people speak on broadcast media (which is effectively what Section 31 imposed on RTE) would seem laughable in the Internet era when organisations, banned or otherwise, can churn out their own casts on Youtube or Myspace and basically create and run their own channels of content. It is an out dated concept of mass communications control which in its time did more harm than good and which, to defend and protect as a principle today, seems to miss the point about how media is moving and transforming. It is increasingly becoming hard to describe how it operated to journalism or broadcast students who find it difficult to imagine a society where communications media could be so limited but Section 31 thrived in a time of limited broadcasting and indeed limited media choice in Ireland. In an era of global communications not just online but through satellite, cable and mobile the idea of cutting off banned groups from ever being heard or interviewed would be difficult to impose and police -to say the least. The Jenny McGeever and Morning Ireland case of 1988 when an audio fragment of Martin McGuinness’s voice when out on MI and caused a broadcasting crisis and utimately led to McGeever leaving RTE is particularly hard for them to grasp especially since the offending party is now in the seat of power in Stormont. Its only ten years since all this was still a live debate - it took the 2001 Broadcasting Act to finally resolve Section 31 as an issue. But it seems some people find the past hard to let go - even in a week when the British Army is packing up and shipping out and Sinn Fein and the DUP are jointly representing their case in Dublin, London and Brussels. Pity - the past is worth knowing and learning from but a place to live on a daily basis.
